Underwood Dudley, PhD in mathematics and author of "Numerology, or What Pythagoras Wrought," calls numerology "folly" and says, "...there is practically nothing wrong with mysticism...on the other hand, everything is wrong with numerology...numbers do not manage events...(numerology is) the belief that points happen mainly because numbers make them happen...(e.g., Two is wet and cold--if your range is 2, you have a tendency to be wet and cold)...I maintain that Pythagoras was a successful cult leader, and that is essentially all that he was."
It sounds as if Dr Dudley may consider he's contributed additional to the fields of math and science than Pythagoras. The great philosopher Plato was strongly influenced by Pythagoras' doctrines, so it's doubtful Plato would have agreed with Dr Dudley. Pythagoras is known, in between other things, for your hypotenuse theorem, or the Pythagorean Theorem. He's also known as the "father of number;" he established the scientific foundation for mathematics and the philosophy of numbers.
Aside from excluding from his book virtually all valued comprehensive numerology techniques, Dr Dudley issues out the superficiality of some current numerologists' methods. This might be justified due to the fact too many published numerology books provide only a seem into the complex science and, or fail to put it from the very best context. However, numerology (otherwise known as amount mysticism) is a form of mysticism and anyone who has objectively studied the science comes to realize that events and personality traits are represented by numbers, not controlled by them.
Since his statements against numerology are so strong, 1 expects Dr Dudley to decisively invalidate the science. Yet, he fails to complete this.
It's crucial to note that hypothesis or theory can not be proven, it can only be invalidated. Graphology, numerology and astrology have never been scientifically shown being invalid. Seasoned numerologists and astrologers consistently predict fated circumstances and accurately identify personality traits.
Although you can find few or no documented cases of accredited researchers supporting the science of astrology or numerology, the field of graphology has been investigated by academic investigators (click and scroll down in your partial listing: [http://www.decadcorp.com/Graphology.html] ). In order for money to become obtainable to fund search in accredited institutions, a donor or firm has to create a contribution. Do most benefactors indirectly or directly control and dictate what the income are used for? Yes. In today's world it's unlikely someone or corporate donor will designate income towards numerology or astrology research; they're not areas that help to directly cure disease or aid the marketing of corporate promotional efforts.
Contrary to well-liked opinion, traditional scientific theories are not unshakable. That which is discarded by the orthodox scientific community these days may well really well be embraced by the globe tomorrow. The history of science is full of widely held notions refuted by overlooked data. Established scientific standards and belief systems these days are continually being challenged by new discoveries. Old paradigms are shattered, and interesting new platforms are established. Some of these new discoveries and data are publicized, but several are suppressed.
The 9,000 year-old Caucasian skeleton observed in Washington state crushes countless modern day anthropological ideals. The Egyptian monuments and hieroglyphics observed on South Pacific Islands deeply threaten several current celebrated notions as do the discoveries of tops of pyramids and other ancient man-made edifices that rise up in the sea beds in the depths of some of the world's oceans. Numerous of current science's cherished ideals are regularly trounced by overwhelming evidence of a lot more valid concepts. Remember the theory that the world is flat or the theory that the sun revolves on the earth?
Unfortunately, there's a herd mentality formulated in any esteemed group and also the general population generally places the "science authorities" on pedestals. If a researcher varies from the accepted philosophies (or individuals which are dictated to them indirectly by their funding sources), they risk being an outcast; there's too much at stake to vary in the customary standards.
How do we "validate" the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology? For the matter, how do we prove that unconditional love, intuition, or happiness exist? The inability to see the stars during the day doesn't mean they don't exist. We are unable to determine water evaporating, yet this does not disprove the cycle of evaporation and precipitation. One must view the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology from an intuitive, unconventional perspective to start to understand their inherent validity. Yes, newspaper horoscopes are like poetry--meant to become amusing, and applying only a few numerological aspects towards personality analysis or prediction is like expecting to get in shape with a single minute of physical exercise each week; a more thorough process is necessary for results.
It sounds as if Dr Dudley may consider he's contributed additional to the fields of math and science than Pythagoras. The great philosopher Plato was strongly influenced by Pythagoras' doctrines, so it's doubtful Plato would have agreed with Dr Dudley. Pythagoras is known, in between other things, for your hypotenuse theorem, or the Pythagorean Theorem. He's also known as the "father of number;" he established the scientific foundation for mathematics and the philosophy of numbers.
Aside from excluding from his book virtually all valued comprehensive numerology techniques, Dr Dudley issues out the superficiality of some current numerologists' methods. This might be justified due to the fact too many published numerology books provide only a seem into the complex science and, or fail to put it from the very best context. However, numerology (otherwise known as amount mysticism) is a form of mysticism and anyone who has objectively studied the science comes to realize that events and personality traits are represented by numbers, not controlled by them.
Since his statements against numerology are so strong, 1 expects Dr Dudley to decisively invalidate the science. Yet, he fails to complete this.
It's crucial to note that hypothesis or theory can not be proven, it can only be invalidated. Graphology, numerology and astrology have never been scientifically shown being invalid. Seasoned numerologists and astrologers consistently predict fated circumstances and accurately identify personality traits.
Although you can find few or no documented cases of accredited researchers supporting the science of astrology or numerology, the field of graphology has been investigated by academic investigators (click and scroll down in your partial listing: [http://www.decadcorp.com/Graphology.html] ). In order for money to become obtainable to fund search in accredited institutions, a donor or firm has to create a contribution. Do most benefactors indirectly or directly control and dictate what the income are used for? Yes. In today's world it's unlikely someone or corporate donor will designate income towards numerology or astrology research; they're not areas that help to directly cure disease or aid the marketing of corporate promotional efforts.
Contrary to well-liked opinion, traditional scientific theories are not unshakable. That which is discarded by the orthodox scientific community these days may well really well be embraced by the globe tomorrow. The history of science is full of widely held notions refuted by overlooked data. Established scientific standards and belief systems these days are continually being challenged by new discoveries. Old paradigms are shattered, and interesting new platforms are established. Some of these new discoveries and data are publicized, but several are suppressed.
The 9,000 year-old Caucasian skeleton observed in Washington state crushes countless modern day anthropological ideals. The Egyptian monuments and hieroglyphics observed on South Pacific Islands deeply threaten several current celebrated notions as do the discoveries of tops of pyramids and other ancient man-made edifices that rise up in the sea beds in the depths of some of the world's oceans. Numerous of current science's cherished ideals are regularly trounced by overwhelming evidence of a lot more valid concepts. Remember the theory that the world is flat or the theory that the sun revolves on the earth?
Unfortunately, there's a herd mentality formulated in any esteemed group and also the general population generally places the "science authorities" on pedestals. If a researcher varies from the accepted philosophies (or individuals which are dictated to them indirectly by their funding sources), they risk being an outcast; there's too much at stake to vary in the customary standards.
How do we "validate" the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology? For the matter, how do we prove that unconditional love, intuition, or happiness exist? The inability to see the stars during the day doesn't mean they don't exist. We are unable to determine water evaporating, yet this does not disprove the cycle of evaporation and precipitation. One must view the sciences of numerology, astrology and graphology from an intuitive, unconventional perspective to start to understand their inherent validity. Yes, newspaper horoscopes are like poetry--meant to become amusing, and applying only a few numerological aspects towards personality analysis or prediction is like expecting to get in shape with a single minute of physical exercise each week; a more thorough process is necessary for results.
About the Author:
Astrology, Numerology & Handwriting Analysis - Far From Becoming Pseudo SciencesCheck Out astrology compatibility and libra woman libra man
No comments:
Post a Comment