Frontiers of Information Technology& Super Science of Astrology-Where do they match? We all know how significantly IT (Information Technology) has helped in doing calculations for astrology in a few seconds as compared to hours taken in the past. This it has result in spread of astrology- at least the calculations are there without a lot effort! Now have you wondered how astrology could nonetheless be a science - despite some 1 seeking at the chart in accordance with lagna, or searching on your chart in accordance with moon sign or even sun sign?
This stands out as the quite reason "scientists" declare it as a fraud including a pseudo science. Which it is NOT. It's based on chance/probability estimate of an event to happen- like would marriage happen in 2009, what is the chance from the same? Is it 30%, 60% to more- there's no YES/NO answer as we normally give in sciences.
But we do the same in quantum physics; in industry prediction/economics software- we talk in terms of probabilities and chance-don't we? The why is it that astrology is an outcast? Permit us analyze this according to a couple of case studies.
A) Judgment from many Ascendants- How proper is it?: How can it be actual that astrologers prefer lasagna fro predictions, and some prefer moon sign for predictions and some Navajoes-but nonetheless mostly astrology could possibly be treated from the purview of science. 1 of the simple methods to resolve this enigma is- that to give weight age to every way of looking at the chart: Lagna = 50%, Moon = 30%, Navarro = x% Etc. So even if an astrologer sees marital conflict because of difference in opinion (Saturn becoming there) in accordance with Lana only- still he is fairly safe if Moon sign chart/rasi chart give neutral indications. So basically what an astrologer is doing is assigning several weights to numerous charts and then drawing a judgment. This really is much done in sciences as well- one of the most from the intelligent systems take into account for this, so we can see how modern-day IT does connect to astrology. Fuzziness means- one can not say that YES or NO, exactly where YES=1 and NO= 0 . You have in-between importance like 0.4. So if lagan says fights on a marital front, but rasi says no- 1 could say the chance of fights is 50%. That is certainly most in the time you will be friendly but there might be occasions of intense fights. The intensity time frame would be predicted in accordance with dasha or transits.
B) Idea of Beneficial and Adverse Astrologer? Have you ever wondered why there is a concept of good, bad or better astrologer? Enable us explore the same? Allow us analyze the over Kundli, exactly where mars maha dasha is ON, active, and permit us see how astrologers of various insights may well view it.
Case 1= Average Astrologer: Now an average astrologer would say - Your Mars is averagely placed in Virgo and mars as being a natural malefic/bad planet, so fights in general could possibly be there, because it is in 2nd household so difficulties in profession(2nd house has an indirect bearing on profession).
This stands out as the quite reason "scientists" declare it as a fraud including a pseudo science. Which it is NOT. It's based on chance/probability estimate of an event to happen- like would marriage happen in 2009, what is the chance from the same? Is it 30%, 60% to more- there's no YES/NO answer as we normally give in sciences.
But we do the same in quantum physics; in industry prediction/economics software- we talk in terms of probabilities and chance-don't we? The why is it that astrology is an outcast? Permit us analyze this according to a couple of case studies.
A) Judgment from many Ascendants- How proper is it?: How can it be actual that astrologers prefer lasagna fro predictions, and some prefer moon sign for predictions and some Navajoes-but nonetheless mostly astrology could possibly be treated from the purview of science. 1 of the simple methods to resolve this enigma is- that to give weight age to every way of looking at the chart: Lagna = 50%, Moon = 30%, Navarro = x% Etc. So even if an astrologer sees marital conflict because of difference in opinion (Saturn becoming there) in accordance with Lana only- still he is fairly safe if Moon sign chart/rasi chart give neutral indications. So basically what an astrologer is doing is assigning several weights to numerous charts and then drawing a judgment. This really is much done in sciences as well- one of the most from the intelligent systems take into account for this, so we can see how modern-day IT does connect to astrology. Fuzziness means- one can not say that YES or NO, exactly where YES=1 and NO= 0 . You have in-between importance like 0.4. So if lagan says fights on a marital front, but rasi says no- 1 could say the chance of fights is 50%. That is certainly most in the time you will be friendly but there might be occasions of intense fights. The intensity time frame would be predicted in accordance with dasha or transits.
B) Idea of Beneficial and Adverse Astrologer? Have you ever wondered why there is a concept of good, bad or better astrologer? Enable us explore the same? Allow us analyze the over Kundli, exactly where mars maha dasha is ON, active, and permit us see how astrologers of various insights may well view it.
Case 1= Average Astrologer: Now an average astrologer would say - Your Mars is averagely placed in Virgo and mars as being a natural malefic/bad planet, so fights in general could possibly be there, because it is in 2nd household so difficulties in profession(2nd house has an indirect bearing on profession).
About the Author:
Frontiers of information generation & super science of Astrology - where Do They fit - zodiac signs and astrology
No comments:
Post a Comment